- Solve real problems with our hands-on interface
- Progress from basic puts and calls to advanced strategies

Posted May 20, 2026 at 4:57 am
Investopedia is partnering with All Star Charts on this newsletter. The contents of this newsletter are for informational and educational purposes only.
Two of the worst market tops shared the same warning sign.
It appeared before the tech bubble in 2000 and the financial crisis in 2007. Both times, the S&P 500 lost roughly half its value in the years that followed.
The signal isn’t always right. It flashed a false alarm in 2014, when the breakdown reversed and the rally kept going for years.
But it’s signaling again right now.
The ratio between Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples just broke to its lowest level since June, even as the S&P 500 climbed to a fresh all-time high.
Here’s why the chart matters, and what it would take to invalidate the warning.

The ratio I’m watching is RSPD against RSPS, which compares the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF against its Consumer Staples counterpart.
It’s one of the cleanest ways to measure risk appetite beneath the surface of the market.
Discretionary stocks represent the offense, the high-beta and economically sensitive names like automakers, retailers, travel companies, and luxury brands that consumers can delay buying when confidence weakens.
Staples are the defense, the everyday essentials like toothpaste, soda, detergent, and packaged food that people keep buying regardless of what’s happening in the economy.
When investors are confident, they pile into offense and the ratio rises. The opposite happens when confidence weakens: money rotates to defense and the ratio falls.
Right now, that ratio is moving the wrong direction for a healthy bull market. The S&P 500 is hitting fresh records while RSPD/RSPS is making lower lows.
In a normal rally, discretionary should be outperforming staples, but the opposite is happening, and if the trend continues lower, it’s an early warning that something beneath the surface is starting to break.
What This Means for Investors
The divergence is a warning, not a verdict, and bull markets can run while these ratios stay weak for months at a time.
What happens next determines which version of this signal we’re seeing. If RSPD/RSPS turns higher and reclaims its recent range, the divergence resolves and the warning gets canceled. If it keeps falling while the S&P 500 climbs, the case for caution gets stronger every week the gap widens.
The ratio sits at 1.73 today, its lowest reading since June. The 2000 and 2007 setups took months to play out, and the 2014 false alarm reversed within a year.
For anyone trying to gauge whether this rally has staying power, this is the chart to keep on the radar.
If you want more of our daily insight, check out All Star Charts.
—
Originally posted 19th May 2026
Investopedia.com: The comments, opinions and analyses expressed herein are for informational purposes only and should not be considered individual investment advice or recommendations to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. While we believe the information provided herein is reliable, we do not warrant its accuracy or completeness. The views and strategies described on our content may not be suitable for all investors. Because market and economic conditions are subject to rapid change, all comments, opinions and analyses contained within our content are rendered as of the date of the posting and may change without notice. The material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region, market, industry, investment or strategy. This information is intended for US residents only.
Information posted on IBKR Campus that is provided by third-parties does NOT constitute a recommendation that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Campus are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from Investopedia and is being posted with its permission. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or Investopedia and Interactive Brokers is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any security. It should not be construed as research or investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or commodity. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
Join The Conversation
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!