- Solve real problems with our hands-on interface
- Progress from basic puts and calls to advanced strategies
Interactive Options Course
Posted May 8, 2026 at 1:05 pm
Today’s theme music: Blood, Sweat & Tears
One of the basic rules of earthbound gravity is this: “what goes up, must come down.” Lately it seems as though stock markets have been ruled by anti-gravity, because the opposite is more likely to be true. In fact, that is the basis of many successful trading strategies. In an environment where “buy the dip” is perceived to be an almost foolproof strategy, the implicit assumption is that “what goes down, must go up.”
Market psychology, at least among the sectors most affected by the ever-increasing billions of dollars spent on AI-related technology, is about as ebullient as I can remember. This was certainly a topic of conversation, if not the consensus, among my fellow attendees at this year’s Options Industry Conference. As we noted on Wednesday, there was a bit of a generational schism when it came to market attitudes:
Folks who’ve been through the global financial crisis (GFC) or the internet bubble lead with questions or comments that express their nervousness that we are at risk of repeating those mistakes. The huge rally is the type we’ve historically seen only after market bottoms that were brought about by major changes in fiscal or monetary policy. This one is occurring without fresh fiscal stimulus, amidst higher yields and lower expectations for rate cuts, and of course higher oil. It is also leaving consumer stocks behind, which raises questions about the sustainability of economic growth.
Here’s a thing about the “generation gap”, though: if you’re a portfolio manager at risk of underperformance, your age doesn’t matter. You can’t bear the risk of missing your benchmark by a wide margin or appearing in the lowest quartile of your peers. That means that you have to acquire and maintain exposure to the stocks and sectors that are driving index performance, whether by buying the shares themselves or through the use of “FOMO insurance,” meaning call options on the relevant stocks, ETFs, or indices. No matter how old and/or nervous you might be, you have to hold your nose and dive in, no matter what.
As we also noted, a string of solid earnings reports has been a key, valuable catalyst for the recent rally. There is no shortage of evidence that EPS growth exceeded already-lofty estimates, and that guidance was generally positive – at least among the companies in the sectors with the heaviest weights in market-capitalization-weighted indices. One fly in the ointment might be the fact that the S&P 500 rose about 10% in a period when forward earnings guidance increased by about 4%. It implies that equity market valuations have outpaced their underlying expectations, but that seems like a quibble right now.
Several market participants have concerns about narrow breadth in this market advance, and it is impossible to ignore them. Note the relative 6-month performances of the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) and S&P 500 (SPX) versus the Equal-Weighted S&P 500 (SPW). In the period ending in February, we saw SPW outperform as investors sought value in underappreciated stocks and sectors. The three indices fell in relative tandem in March as all markets reacted to the hostilities in the Persian Gulf, but tech stocks regained the lead in force as we recovered in April and May. This graph doesn’t show the woeful performance in consumer-related and other typically defensive sectors, but that is part of the explanation for SPW’s ho-hum rebound.
6-Months, SPW (red/green candles), SPX (blue line), NDX (purple line)
Source: Interactive Brokers
As I continued to write this morning’s piece, another paradigm came to mind. I didn’t have a chance to enjoy the hotel pool while attending this week’s conference in Florida, but I did look longingly at the other guests who did. Some kids were attempting to submerge an inflatable toy, but it kept popping up to, and sometimes through, the surface. I’m not sure that anyone is explicitly trying to push markets lower, but tech stocks, and thus the broad market, act just like that surging beach ball every time they drop.
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. For information on the uses and risks of options, you can obtain a copy of the Options Clearing Corporation risk disclosure document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options by going to the following link ibkr.com/occ. Multiple leg strategies, including spreads, will incur multiple transaction costs.
Related Articles
In backtesting buy the dip strategies across GFC or dot com bust, it’s amazing how fast it destroys portfolios. I don’t think the modern investor understands this. We have had 17 years where buy the dip consistently worked. If and when it doesn’t work, it’s going to be an unbelievable downward catalyst when it breaks. I do find myself wondering how big of shock does there have to be to break it? Clearly much larger than anything we have seen since the GFC.
By some objective measures, we’re at valuations near or above 1999 dot-com mania levels. Today’s bulls will say that 1999 was a disaster that anyone could see coming because it was driven by absurd prices for unproven companies, and this time around proven companies (see Magnificent 7) are leading the way. Perhaps the better analogy is the Nifty Fifty craze in the 1960s. It was not as manic as 1999 and it was based on high-quality companies doing well, but eventually valuations got out of hand, and they fell hard.
I remember the dot com bust, but I do see the marked differences between a vast sea of untested companies going public or jumping on the band wagon (in the dot com hysteria), and what we have today in the Tech sector. It seems those companies are far fewer, and are very much expected to deliver strong earnings and tangible evidence of strong future earnings. I tend not to conflate the 2. I do see the risks in that narrowness we see in tech today, Hence, I do allocate enough of my portfolio to an equal weighted and broad basket of stocks so any big correction is somewhat off set. Anyone putting most of their eggs in that narrow basket (think tech and AI), is indeed throwing caution to the wind.