After last quarter’s earnings I termed Nvidia (NVDA) “The Market’s Atlas”, referring to its seeming ability to hoist the whole market on its broad shoulders. Ahead of tomorrow’s earnings report, here is some further evidence why I believe that analogy remains apt.
(Below, we will refer to some volume internal volume statistics. They come from a “Top 25” activity list that I receive daily. I DO NOT have access to detailed customer information – the numbers are strictly cumulative and have no customer details WHATSOEVER.)
In case you harbor any doubts about the broader market impact of tomorrow’s NVDA earnings, see below. We’ve gotten quite used to seeing NVDA atop the IBKR Top 25 leaderboard most weeks, cementing its key role in investor psychology. Looking beyond that, it is quite clear that the company plays a crucial role affecting a wide range of other popular investment vehicles.
- At #10, we have NVDL, the GraniteShares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF. If customers like NVDA, why shouldn’t some like it twice as much via a 2X single-stock ETF?
- At #4 and #9 we have The Direxion Daily Seminconductors Bull and Bear 3X ETFs (SOXL, SOXS). Thanks to NVDA’s 9.5% weighing in the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Semiconductor Index (SOX), the sector’s bellwether, of course some investors would seek to triple-lever their exposure to the sector, both up (SOXL) and down (SOXS). (Interestingly, unlevered SOXX is not on the list. Our customers like action.)
- Any hiccups in demand for NVDA’s products could have an effect on other semiconductor stocks, such as #3 AMD, #20 Intel (INTC), and #22 Micron (MU).
- NVDA’s weight in the Nasdaq 100 Index (NDX) is a bit over 8%, so of course it will have an effect on ETFs that track NDX. Triple-levered TQQQ (Proshares Ultrapro QQQ) is in 6th, outpacing the 7th place “regular” QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1 ETF) upon which it is based, and the -3X SQQQ (Proshares Ultrapro Short QQQ) which brings up the rear in 25th place.
- NVDA is also about 6.5% of the S&P 500 (SPX), thus affecting #17 SPY (SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust).
- Then of course, we have some of NVDA’s key customers, not limited to #2 Tesla (TSLA), #8 Super Micro Computer (SMCI, and the volume stat are from before today’s Hindenburg induced dip and partial recovery), #13 Meta Platforms (META), #15 Amazon (AMZN), #16 Apple (AAPL), and #18 Microsoft (MSFT). (Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL) would complete the Mag 7 superfecta, but it missed this week’s list.)
- And, for those who remember NVDA as the key cryptocurrency supplier, we can include #12 Microstrategy (MSTR) and #23 Coinbase (COIN) as potentially affected stocks.
I frankly can’t think of any historical precedent for NVDA’s ability to beat consensus estimates for the top and bottom lines while raising guidance and then doing it again quarter after quarter. It’s been simply astounding. Logically, one would expect that the pace of growth would eventually slow. Those who are developing artificial intelligence applications might understandably want to focus upon finding profitable real-world uses for them rather than simply continuing to spend more money on creating them. But we haven’t seen that yet.
The risk, of course, is that NVDA acknowledges that possibility. It can happen at any time, though of course it hasn’t happened yet. But it is indisputable that the longer-term volatility has increased. A bit over six weeks ago, on July 10, NVDA traded up to $136.15 before closing at $127.40. Three weeks ago, when the yen carry trade imploded, the stock opened at $92.06, and touched $90.69 before closing at $100.45. Yesterday, we were briefly back over $131, a few dollars above where we trade currently.
After this trillion dollar turnaround, it seems fair to be concerned that we head into earnings with re-inflated expectations, potentially with an even higher “whisper number” in investors’ minds. Bearing in mind that CEO Jensen Huang has been selling hundreds of millions of dollars of stock recently, and it’s exceedingly unlikely to expect another 10:1 split, the stakes are indeed quite high.
Join The Conversation
If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
Leave a Reply
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
Disclosure: Buffered Outcome ETFs
Investors may lose their entire investment, regardless of when they purchase ETF shares, and even if they hold the shares for an entire Outcome Period. There is no guarantee that the Fund will be successful in its attempt to provide the Outcomes for an Outcome Period. The Cap may increase or decrease and may vary significantly. An investor who purchases Fund Shares after the Outcome Period has begun or sells Fund Shares prior to the end of the Outcome Period may experience results that are very different from the investment objective sought by the Fund for that Outcome Period. There is no guarantee that the Cap will remain the same after the end of the Outcome Period. The Buffered Outcome ETFs' investment strategies are different from more typical investment products, and the Funds may be unsuitable for some investors. It is important that investors understand the investment strategy before making an investment. For more information regarding whether an investment in the Fund is right for you, please see the prospectus.
Disclosure: Cryptocurrency based Exchange Traded Products (ETPs)
Cryptocurrency based Exchange Traded Products (ETPs) are high risk and speculative. Cryptocurrency ETPs are not suitable for all investors. You may lose your entire investment. For more information please view the RISK DISCLOSURE REGARDING COMPLEX OR LEVERAGED EXCHANGE TRADED PRODUCTS.
Disclosure: Complex or Leveraged Exchange-Traded Products
Complex or Leveraged Exchange-Traded Products are complicated instruments that should only be used by sophisticated investors who fully understand the terms, investment strategy, and risks associated with the products. Learn more about the risks here: https://gdcdyn.interactivebrokers.com/Universal/servlet/Registration_v2.formSampleView?formdb=4155
Disclosure: ETFs
Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
It look like you just spray cold water on the party.
I wait for the disappointment occurring tomorrow and the ‘talking’ heads who pop up and say they ‘called’ it with the media featuring them all over the place, but before this they were little recognized and no real proof that they ever ‘called’ anything.
Now more voice is being given that Huang sold so much, and if the stock disappoints then the cry-babies will shout that he knew and did not tell. If that occurs, he’s lucky that President Xi can’t force him to come for tea.
Idk, no crystal balm but if you look at options and the spread between puts and calls, the market is betting big on another beat.