Market Recap
- The S&P 500 slipped 1.5%, with technology and consumer discretionary down more than 3% each. From a technical perspective, the 50-day moving average has now sunk below the 200-day average in the dreaded ‘death cross’ even as markets have stabilized.
- The TSX outperformed on the week, adding 2.6% with gains across all major sectors. Health care led, up 5.2%, while energy and telecom rose more than 3%.
- Canadian moving averages haven’t yet crossed over, but the index is now running into the 200-day average from below.
China
Although the U.S.-China trade war escalated in recent weeks, the confrontation now looks closer to what we imagined it would be. The focus has narrowed from its global scope to this one particular relationship—at least with regards to reciprocal tariffs—and both countries are trying to top each other by continually raising import duties. In our view, this strategy quickly reaches diminishing returns. Once you have made trading prohibitively expensive for businesses, it ceases to matter whether the tariffs will be 150% or 500% because there’s no marginal benefit to increasing them. Corporate leaders have, in all likelihood, already suspended investments and looked for alternatives. We do believe both sides want a deal though, as it’s in their common interests—however, no one wants to appear like they are caving, and as such a standstill could be prolonged. China has also sought greater divergence from the U.S. in recent years, and that pivot is likely to accelerate given the situation. While the focus on China is positive for most other countries, in the sense it provides the U.S. an incentive to reach individual deals and consolidate support, there are some difficulties. Vietnam is a good example. It ranked fourth for the biggest U.S. trade deficit in 2024, and accounts for nearly one-third of U.S. footwear and a key source for Nike, Lululemon, and Adidas, to name a few. They certainly want to sign an agreement, but insistence on isolating China could be a problem since that’s the source of many of input materials. Companies can look for new supply chains, of course, but some connections will be harder or far costlier to replace than others.
Bottom line: Although the standoff is unlikely to worsen, a compromise remains elusive given that neither side wants to be perceived as yielding.
Chips
The semiconductor industry was shaken last week when the Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang warned that his company would take a $5.5 billion write down this year owing to restrictions on selling artificial intelligence microchips to China.1 Around the same time, ASML Holding NV reported that first quarter orders were €1 billion less than expected.2 Its share price fell as much as 7.6% after the announcement, mostly on tariff-related forward guidance. The average price target for TSMC, another major chipmaker, also dropped by 9% this month.3 It’s been a rough period for the industry—and though we could see delivery volumes adjust to the new status quo, it’s important to maintain perspective. China still ordered mass shipments of AI chips in anticipation of the tariffs, which provides immediate revenue.
Bottom line: Rather than being purely reactive, investors should consider the recent volatility in context of the long-term AI chip demand.
U.S. dollar
Another unintended consequence of the tariff debacle has been the backward slide of the U.S. dollar. Typically considered a safe haven when markets are in crisis, the U.S. dollar has actually declined during the recent turmoil because investors have less confidence in U.S. leadership. For the first time since the early days of the 2008 financial crisis, the dollar has lost some of its luster. Will this trigger a switch in the world’s reserve currency? We believe this is too early to tell, because the loss of confidence is so tied to the current regime—the next Administration may have drastically different policies. For the immediate future, however, our outlook is for a weaker U.S. dollar. It has already declined against the CAD, and although it’s currently strengthening against the Chinese yuan, one year from now we would expect it be lower relative to a broader basket of currencies. That being said, for the medium to long-term, a currency depreciation must be tied to a material deterioration in the economy and the strength of the country relative to other nations. The entire point of Trump’s trade war is to pressure other counties to buy more U.S. goods—and in order to do that you have to buy more U.S. dollars. Investors worried about currency implications should watch the fine print of these agreements to see how much they mandate the buying of U.S. manufactured goods, as that could create a tailwind for the greenback moving forward.
Bottom line: The U.S. dollar will likely pare back this year, but if the U.S. economy remains strong over the long term, the USD will as well.
—
Originally Posted April 21, 2025 – Trump tariffs, China and chips
Disclosure: BMO Exchange Traded Funds
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange traded funds. Please read the ETF Facts or prospectus of the BMO ETFs before investing. Exchange traded funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.
For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the BMO ETF’s prospectus. BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO ETFs are managed by BMO Asset Management Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a portfolio manager, and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.
®/™Registered trade-marks/trade-mark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers Third Party
Information posted on IBKR Campus that is provided by third-parties does NOT constitute a recommendation that you should contract for the services of that third party. Third-party participants who contribute to IBKR Campus are independent of Interactive Brokers and Interactive Brokers does not make any representations or warranties concerning the services offered, their past or future performance, or the accuracy of the information provided by the third party. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
This material is from BMO Exchange Traded Funds and is being posted with its permission. The views expressed in this material are solely those of the author and/or BMO Exchange Traded Funds and Interactive Brokers is not endorsing or recommending any investment or trading discussed in the material. This material is not and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell any security. It should not be construed as research or investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or commodity. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
Disclosure: Forex
There is a substantial risk of loss in foreign exchange trading. The settlement date of foreign exchange trades can vary due to time zone differences and bank holidays. When trading across foreign exchange markets, this may necessitate borrowing funds to settle foreign exchange trades. The interest rate on borrowed funds must be considered when computing the cost of trades across multiple markets.
Join The Conversation
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!