- Solve real problems with our hands-on interface
- Progress from basic puts and calls to advanced strategies

Posted May 27, 2026 at 1:00 pm
This morning got off to a hopeful start for those who would like to see a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz – and by that, I mean pretty much every global investor. Oil futures fell after Iran’s state television reported on a draft interim peace deal that would allow maritime traffic to resume. Unfortunately, a few hours later the White House dismissed that report as “a complete fabrication.” Oh well. Oil futures recovered some, but not all their losses, and stocks took a minor breather for the first time in a while.
Interestingly, stock indices skipped their customary rally when the first piece of news hit the wires. Indeed, pre-market futures were higher, but that is hardly newsworthy at this point. ES and NQ futures were up about 0.3% and 0.8%, respectively, at their best. Yet the nascent rally stalled out even before the White House denial. Although this might have been the first sign of “sell the news” after weeks of relentlessly ratcheting higher on each hopeful note of progress, that seems overstated. More likely, what we see today is simply a pause in the powerful chip-led advance with a bit of sectoral rotation thrown in for good measure.
Looking at the breakdown of S&P 500 (SPX) sectors around noon, we see 7 of the 11 trading higher with the index about 0.1% lower. That’s hardly a selloff. Consumer stocks, both discretionary and staples, are the leaders, with energy, financials, and information technology leading the downside. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) is taking a day off with a 2% decline, even with many popular memory chip manufacturers like Micron Technology (MU), Seagate (STX), and Western Digital (WDC) continuing their customary advances. Momentum-driven inflows continue into that sector, which has also powered their Korean-listed counterparts to truly stellar advances. It takes quite a bit to get now-trillion-dollar stocks to consistently rise by double-digit percentages, but their inclusion in newly popular investment vehicles is powering that advance.
Bonds have also taken a bit of a breather. As we noted yesterday, yields fell across the curve, so while it is not concerning that bonds seem to be consolidating their recent gains (remember, bond prices and yields move inversely), it might be notable that they failed to rally substantially when today’s hopes seemed brightest. Then again, the recent substantial flattening of the yield curve likely factored in the relative stasis. Much of that change occurred late last week, thanks to a change in tone from an influential Fed Governor. As we wrote on Friday:
The flattening is likely linked to comments from Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who advocated that the Fed should drop the “easing bias” from its policy statement. While he hasn’t yet advocated for a hike, he noted that “inflation is not headed in the right direction.” This would have him joining the three FOMC members who dissented at the last meeting because they too wanted to remove the easing bias from the statement.
Waller’s comments are notable for two reasons. First, it adds to the chorus of FOMC members who are opposed to immediate rate hikes. A greater focus on fighting inflation would raise the likelihood of future hikes, pushing up short-term rates while potentially lowering long-term rates by lowering inflationary expectations. Second, bear in mind that Waller had been among the more dovish members of the FOMC, advocating for lower rates during the period when the President was actively considering candidates for Jerome Powell’s successor.
The following chart shows the scope of the recent flattening:

Source: Bloomberg
Thus, another day of hope and another day of dashed hopes. Unlike the numerous other times we have seen this pattern, stocks seemed to have yawned. Perhaps they need more of a rationale (or excuse) to rally today. For today at least, the ratchet was relatively stagnant.
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
Futures are not suitable for all investors. The amount you may lose may be greater than your initial investment. Before trading futures, please read the CFTC Risk Disclosure. A copy and additional information are available at ibkr.com.
I think it may be well advised to step back and think about where an individual stands on the investing spectrum. There is a. big difference between those who see investing as supporting their day to day existence and those whose orientation is more long term. The former must be more cautious; the latter can (maybe must) take an approach that rides out the bumps. Almost every year has a period or two of significant decline, but as I have noted before, in the long run, the trend of the market is up. What Trump does, even more important what he says, is self indulgent. Yes, it may move the market temporally, but more often the effect is temporary, especially if it is the result of what he said rather than he did. This is not to say that this result can’t cause a major damage for investors, hence those who invest for a living, being more defensive. The strait will eventually open; there is too much that passes through for the world to accept a long term/permanent closure. Obviously, he has been advised to declare victory and go home, but clearly Trump is fearful that that will be seen as a personal defeat. Waiting for a group Republican wisemen to come to him as they did with Nixon, is wishful thinking. Clearly, it didn’t work when he supported Paxson. So it seems to me that the important thing is not trying to decide what Trump may or may not do, but deciding what kind of risk you are willing to bear.
People are Trump obsessed and I just don’t get it. The President will do what’s best for the US and for the region. He may be egotistical, but not to the extent he’ll put his ego before what’s best for US and Gulf State interests. He may very well get those Arab States to join the Abraham Accords. I’m sure he’ll get no credit from the usual suspects. I’m so tired of the politicizing of everything. Why is Powell staying? Many would argue that’s all ego, but no one willing to say it.
A ballroom, painting the reflecting pool, an arch, a stage for a wrestling match, the Kennedy Center, refurnishing the “gift” Air Force One, shall I go on. But no money to buy drones from Ukraine to protect the troops. He sits on his priorities.
Nothing like listing your personal neuroses about Trump to prove the point
Hmm.. I wonder if the 1st piece of “news” from Iran State controlled media wasn’t considered news at all. I mean, considering the Iranian leadership lies continuously and attempts to use US media to spread propaganda. Just a thought.