- Solve real problems with our hands-on interface
- Progress from basic puts and calls to advanced strategies
Posted September 15, 2025 at 1:01 pm
On many days we have one major narrative driving the day’s activity. On some days we struggle to find any. Today I’ve been asked to discuss several major issues even beyond the ever-present considerations about Wednesday’s FOMC meeting. In rough order, the topics included the FOMC (of course), China’s ruling that Nvidia (NVDA) violated monopoly rules amidst high-level trade negotiations, the revelation that Elon Musk bought $1 billion worth of Tesla (TSLA) shares, and the President’s musing about a move to semi-annual rather than quarterly earnings reports.
My first comments came in a media appearance very early today. Foremost of course what the FOMC might do this week. We’ve discussed our assertion that a “hawkish cut” is the most likely scenario because prices — as measured by Core PCE and Core CPI — continue to creep higher at a faster pace than the Fed’s desired target, and I reiterated that to the TV audience. As for the trade talks, the early reports were that progress was being made, but that at the same time we learned that a preliminary investigation by Chinese regulators found that NVDA’s 2020 acquisition of Mellanox violated antitrust conditions. My initial reaction was that the timing seemed like a bit of a negotiating ploy to increase China’s leverage on a key US export industry. That seems to be the prevailing mood as the morning wore on. NVDA was only modestly lower in the pre-market; we now find it roughly unchanged at midday and the SOX semiconductor index about ½% higher.
We have since learned that an agreement regarding a TikTok divestiture may have been reached, and that Presidents Trump and Xi plan to discuss it on Friday. That is not necessarily market moving, but it is encouraging to learn that two key world leaders will be having a discussion.
Shortly after, we learned about Elon Musk’s purchase of $1 billion worth of shares on Friday. My take to a reporter was “what’s a billion dollars if it can earn you a trillion?” From a trading standpoint, it was a well-timed purchase. The stock was in a nascent uptrend before Friday, and it is probably fair to assume that Musk’s buys were the impetus for the breakout above May’s highs. (It’s probably not a coincidence that the stock is consolidating today’s gains around the $420 level either.) It’s quite possible that Musk’s holdings are already in the black by more than the $1 billion he just spent.
TSLA 6-Months, Daily Candles
Source: Interactive Brokers
The President’s call for a shift to twice-annual rather than quarterly earnings reports from public companies seemed to come from out of the blue. In fact, this is a topic that arose during his first term. In a 2018 Twitter post, Trump asked the SEC to study moving from a quarterly to a six-month reporting cycle. It obviously was never implemented. The original rationale was that the change would save companies money, and that was part of his rationale today. The second part seemed a bit odd, though:
Did you ever hear the statement that, ‘China has a 50 to 100 year view on management of a company, whereas we run our companies on a quarterly basis???’ Not good!!!
I can’t imagine that making America’s financial system more like China’s was on most investors’ bingo cards. But it’s not only China that has this more relaxed requirement – the UK and EU do as well.
When asked how this might affect investors, my response was that it might add difficulty for institutional investors and analysts who prefer quarterly updates and guidance but matter little to smaller investors. That said, it could increase single-stock volatility around earnings dates. With fewer updates to corporate performance and guidance, it would be understandable if each of them brought more uncertainty. That is at best a hypothesis at this point.
As of now, we can see that investors are taking all this in stride. Stocks rose steadily in the pre-market, then again as the market opened, and have since been holding onto their solid gains. Note however that VIX has risen along with the S&P 500 (SPX) upon which it is based. Perhaps the idea of “don’t fight the tape, but insure against it” is in a bit of vogue today ahead of the FOMC meeting.
For specific platform feedback and suggestions, please submit it directly to our team using these instructions.
If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
We encourage you to look through our FAQs before posting. Your question may already be covered!
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
It is always worthwhile to have a healthy skepticism when confronting a market decision. It is a fact that the market tends to trend up over time, but it is also true that the market will fluctuate. Although it is a less widely held notion, it has always appeared to me that the market has the habit of moving in a manner that inflicts the greatest pain on the greatest number. (I’m not saying this is intentional, only that it happens.) If I’m correct in this observation, then not getting caught up in the momentum, can save you from having a profit turn into a loss. Individual stocks as well as larger market moments, happen over extended periods of time. It is rare to catch the initial moment of inflection, nor do they ring a bell at the top. If you sell a position after you’ve made a profit, you may regret the part that got away, but you won’t go home wearing a barrel. You are lucky enough to get 60 or 70% of the move you can do quite well, and you don’t go broke by selling part, and holding some to see what happens.