Asset Classes

Free investment financial education

Language

Multilingual content from IBKR

Close Navigation
Learn more about IBKR accounts
Tapping the Brakes on Futurism

Tapping the Brakes on Futurism

Posted July 24, 2024 at 11:15 am
Steve Sosnick
Interactive Brokers

There’s really no way to sugarcoat this: it’s an ugly day for equity investors.  As I type this, the S&P 500 (SPX) is down -1.75% and the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) is down -2.9%.  The megacap tech stocks are once again the culprit, thanks to poor reactions to earnings reports from Alphabet (GOOG, GOOGL; -4.9%) and Tesla (TSLA, -10.3%).  The root cause is less about the actual numbers than the dampening of enthusiasm about artificial intelligence and other futuristic developments.  And both moves are roughly in line with the options market expectations that we wrote about yesterday.

Even though TSLA is bearing the brunt of the declines, comments from GOOGL strike me as the bigger concern.  Its CEO, Sundar Pichai, threw some cold water on investors’ overheated expectations for AI during the earnings call:


But I think we are in this phase where we have to deeply work and make sure on these use cases [for their AI products], on these workflows, we are driving deeper progress on unlocking value, which I'm very bullish will happen. But these things take time. [emphasis mine] So — but if I were to take a longer-term outlook, I definitely see a big opportunity here.

Hmmm, where have we heard something like this before?  Oh yeah, we wrote about Mark Zuckerberg’s similar comments after Meta Platforms’ (META) April earnings call:

And I also expect to see a multiyear investment cycle before we’ve fully scaled Meta AI, business AIs, and more into the profitable services I expect as well.

Comments like these hardly negate the expectation that AI can indeed offer meaningful improvements to the profitability of its key providers.  But investors seem to need reminders – painful reminders, sometimes – that AI’s contributions to their bottom lines might be years away and more expensive to achieve.  And this says little about AI’s contributions to ordinary users.  It offers the potential for efficiency, where technology replaces labor.  But in practice, at least in the short term, it requires very expensive investments in computing power and well-paid technologists to hopefully replace low-level workers.  That can be a difficult thing for investors to swallow, whether from technology providers or users.

I don’t enjoy making comparisons to the current AI enthusiasm with the 2000-era internet bubble because they’re imperfect at best.  But there is one that bears repeating.  The internet proved to be everything its most wide-eyed advocates hoped for, and more.  Yet it took longer for those achievements to reap the returns on investment that investors originally expected.  It is also useful to bear in mind that the two internet leaders we’ve discussed thus far – GOOGL and META – didn’t even exist during the internet bubble.  Could it be that the company that best figures out how to utilize the promise of generative AI exists either in a garage somewhere or even only in a teenager’s imagination?

That said, GOOGL’s business in the here and now is doing just fine.  Revenues and earnings both beat expectations and grew rapidly, up +13.6% and +32% respectively over the past year.  And even after spending a staggering $13.2 billion on capital expenditure, its free cash flow was still $13.4 billion.   Despite the disappointment over the pace of AI profitability, this is a huge growth stock that is growing rapidly.

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said for TSLA.  Revenues beat expectations thanks mainly to a surprise bump in regulatory credits, but they are still up only +2.3% from a year ago.  Meanwhile, its adjusted EPS of $0.52, which is -28% below the year ago number, missed expectations for the fourth consecutive quarter.  TSLA is no longer a growth stock in the classic sense.  It’s always been about the future, even when its bottom line was growing exponentially.  Unfortunately, that company’s future is also further away than hoped.

We received official confirmation of the reports that the promised robotaxi unveiling would be postponed from August to October, but also learned that any cars unveiled would only be prototypes.  More affordable models won’t be ready until the first half of 2025 at the earliest.  A hoped-for humanoid robot won’t be available until at least late 2025.  And in a blow to the AI poster child, Nvidia (NVDA), the company reiterated its commitment to its Dojo computer project.  If the present is rocky and the future is murky and further away, it’s not a surprise to see the stock selling off sharply.

Is there any good news today?  Perhaps.  For starters, we have the Russell 2000 (RTY) and Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) only down slightly, so we still see signs of “routation” rather than “get me out”.  That is echoed by the fact that declining stocks on both the NYSE and Nasdaq are only outpacing advancers by about 1.5:1.  Also, at least so far, we are still avoiding the ever-rare -2% decline in SPX.

And if we want to look at a half-full glass, perhaps today’s reaction to GOOGL’s earnings means that expectations for the upcoming earnings in other key AI-related stocks, like META and Microsoft (MSFT), may have come down to earth somewhat.  Investors set very high bars for many of their favorites.  Perhaps they have been lowered just a bit.

Join The Conversation

If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.

2 thoughts on “Tapping the Brakes on Futurism”

  • MonochromicPony

    Wednesday’s Im tied up on volunteer obligations, which I enjoy (retired), but missed epic shorting opportunity in e-mini NASDAQ 100 futures today (I trade MNQ, the micro). And is MES as well (micro e-mini S&P 500). :-/

  • JOE GERONIMO

    except reading this the next day, everything suggested here (which I think is greatlyexergerated) from the GOOG statement proves to basically false when reading the results from NOW/SERVICE NOW which gives full credit to Ai for the stella performance announced.

Leave a Reply

Disclosure: Interactive Brokers

The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.

Disclosure: ETFs

Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.

IBKR Campus Newsletters

This website uses cookies to collect usage information in order to offer a better browsing experience. By browsing this site or by clicking on the "ACCEPT COOKIES" button you accept our Cookie Policy.