Consumer moods improved this month on the back of stock market optimism following three consecutive months of declines. May\u2019s Conference Board Consumer Confidence index rose to 102, arriving well ahead of the 95.9 median estimate and last month\u2019s 97. Both the Present Situation and Expectations components contributed to the uptick, increasing from 140.6 and 68.8 to 143.1 and 74.6, respectively. Households were content with tight labor conditions as well as future prospects concerning business possibilities, employment and income. Folks were concerned about lofty prices, however, especially for nutrition, while maintaining pessimistic outlooks for disinflation and rates as a result. Plans for big-ticket purchases remained depressed with elevated prices, steep borrowing costs and reduced credit availability weighing on ordering activity. Finally, Americans called the odds for recession likely while CEOs were more sanguine, sustaining odds of roughly 35%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a CNBC interview today, Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari shared a hawkish view on fighting inflation. While Fed members, broadly speaking, want more data pointing to a sustainable decline in price pressures before cutting, Kashkari said he thinks \u201cmany more months of positive inflation data\u201d are needed before monetary policy should be eased. He also said he hasn\u2019t ruled out raising if inflation doesn\u2019t improve. Kashkari is a non-voting Fed member but provides input during policy discussions. He will become a voting member in 2026. In April, the year-over -year (y\/y) inflation rate was 3.4%. Kashkari said the Fed may eventually increase its current 2% target inflation rate, but doing so now would be inappropriate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Also today, Fed Governor Michelle Bowman, during a conference in Tokyo, said she thinks the Fed\u2019s decision earlier this month to slow its reduction in the size of its balance sheet was premature. The Fed should have either kept the previous rate or made a smaller reduction in the pace at which it is contracting the balance sheet. Bowman says the banking system has adequate reserves, so the Fed can reduce the balance sheet at a faster pace. Advocates for maintaining the current pace point to 2019 when the Fed slashed its balance sheet too quickly, causing the repo market to freeze and interest rates to hit 9%. The Fed had to inject emergency funding back into the banking system to restore liquidity. During the same conference, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland President Loretta Mester said the Fed needs to evaluate its methods for communicating its views on how changes in the economy could impact monetary policy. By expanding discussions regarding potential risks, the Fed could protect its credibility if it unexpectedly needs to shift its monetary policy. She added that the current post-meeting public statement provided by the Fed is too short, causing investors to place too much emphasis on individual words. Additionally, the Fed should consider providing scenario analysis, which would explain potential reactions to different changes in economic indicators. The Fed is likely to assess its communications as part of a five-year review expected to start at the end of this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Investors are watching to see how the transition to one-day trade settlement or T+1 starts today. It is the first time in 100 years since T+1 has occurred. The prior practice, handled manually, was terminated when volumes grew, making it impractical. With the implementation today, investors will get faster settlement but have less time to correct trading errors. Additionally, it creates challenges for cash settlement with cross-border trading. Over the long term, T+1 is expected to improve liquidity, but in the short term, it may create an increase in failed trades. With this in mind, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association have created the T+1 Command Center to identify and respond to problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Technology shares are dominating the tape today with limited bullish action occurring outside of growth. Indeed, the Nasdaq Composite Index is the only gainer out of the major equity benchmarks; it\u2019s up 0.2%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 baskets are near the flatline while the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down a meaningful 0.4%. Sectoral breadth is negative with four out of eleven sectors trading north, led by energy, technology and utilities: they\u2019re up 0.8%, 0.5% and 0.2%. Piloting the laggards are the health care, financials and consumer staples, which are losing 1.2%, 0.9% and 0.9%. We\u2019re witnessing some bifurcated action across the yield curve as the short-end moves slightly lower while longer-dated maturities shift higher. The 2- and 10-year Treasury maturities are changing hands at 4.93% and 4.49%, 2 basis points lower for the former but higher for the latter. The greenback is slightly lighter and down relative to most of its counterparts, including the euro, pound sterling, franc, and Aussie dollar. The US currency is gaining versus the Canadian dollar and the yen. Energy stocks are benefitting from an increase in the price of crude oil, with WTI up 1.2%, or $0.97 to $79.49 per barrel. The commodity is being relieved by the expectation that the OPEC+ cartel will maintain supply limits at its meeting this Sunday amidst forecasters that hope the unofficial beginning of the summer season will bring many Americans to the highways and the skies. Silver, gold and copper are also trading higher by 0.8%, 0.5% and 0.4%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Market players are quite tranquil as they review today\u2019s data and Fed speak, with rate prospects not moving much. Indeed, fed funds futures point to just one cut this year, with September offering coin-flip odds. Much of the path will be influenced by incoming labor and price data, with strength extending our journey across the monetary policy bridge while weakness will bring the scissors closer to home. We\u2019re expecting May inflation data to offer a reprieve due to cratering oil prices, but core segments will remain sticky, a result of rising services and goods costs. In conclusion, the positivity of May price pressures could just be one month, as loose financial conditions, exuberance in markets and geopolitical uncertainty turn inflation the other way in June. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"Consumer](\"\/campus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/05\/Consumer-Conficence-5-28-24.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"Present](\"\/campus\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/05\/Present-Situation-Index-5-28-24.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nKashkari Maintains Hawkish Stance<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Markets Return to T+1 Trading<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Tech and Growth Rally<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Recent Price Softness Likely to Reverse<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n